<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bye Bye Mr. Buffett</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.contrarianvalueinvesting.com/2008/08/23/bye-bye-mr-buffett/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.contrarianvalueinvesting.com/2008/08/23/bye-bye-mr-buffett/</link>
	<description>Contrarian Value Investing At Its Finest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 03:24:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Recommended Reading - August 29, 2008 &#8212; Old School Value</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianvalueinvesting.com/2008/08/23/bye-bye-mr-buffett/comment-page-1/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Recommended Reading - August 29, 2008 &#8212; Old School Value</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 04:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianvalueinvesting.com/?p=113#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>[...] Bye Bye Mr Buffett by Contrarian Value Investor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bye Bye Mr Buffett by Contrarian Value Investor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisa</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianvalueinvesting.com/2008/08/23/bye-bye-mr-buffett/comment-page-1/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianvalueinvesting.com/?p=113#comment-1125</guid>
		<description>This sounds like a good plan Alex. I am curious about the reference by Chris G to Lexapro. If this is true, will this alter your strategy?

Be well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a good plan Alex. I am curious about the reference by Chris G to Lexapro. If this is true, will this alter your strategy?</p>
<p>Be well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris g</title>
		<link>http://www.contrarianvalueinvesting.com/2008/08/23/bye-bye-mr-buffett/comment-page-1/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>chris g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.contrarianvalueinvesting.com/?p=113#comment-968</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re buying a stock, FRX, that will lose it&#039;s number one drug, Lexapro, which accounts for 80% of the sales in 2012.  You&#039;re hoping that one of the drugs in the pieline will be as successful.  That&#039;s all there is to this.  Of course return on assets and P/E will look good becuase they aren&#039;t looking forward.  To like this stock at this price you have to assume management can hit another homerun.  While that may be possible, it&#039;s not with the spirit of the magic formula stock screen.  THis is not a stable, ongoing business per se.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re buying a stock, FRX, that will lose it&#8217;s number one drug, Lexapro, which accounts for 80% of the sales in 2012.  You&#8217;re hoping that one of the drugs in the pieline will be as successful.  That&#8217;s all there is to this.  Of course return on assets and P/E will look good becuase they aren&#8217;t looking forward.  To like this stock at this price you have to assume management can hit another homerun.  While that may be possible, it&#8217;s not with the spirit of the magic formula stock screen.  THis is not a stable, ongoing business per se.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
